Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Quine's critique of the analytic-synthetic distinction entails that purely a priori reasoning cannot be cleanly separated from empirical commitments.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Logical and mathematical truths (e.g., modus ponens, 2+2=4) remain necessary regardless of empirical change, preserving a meaningful a priori category.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Distinguishing context of discovery from context of justification allows a priori reasoning to be independent even if psychologically influenced by experience.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Non-Euclidean geometry's adoption reflects which mathematics best models nature, not that logical necessity itself is empirically contingent.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Scientific revolutions (Kuhn) show paradigm shifts alter what we consider logically necessary, suggesting a priori truths depend on empirical frameworks.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Euclidean geometry was treated as a priori necessary until empirical discoveries in physics suggested non-Euclidean geometries better describe reality.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Our background beliefs form a web where revising peripheral empirical claims can require adjusting central logical principles to maintain coherence.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.