Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Rational agency requires only the capacity to set and pursue ends, not the development of any particular talent or set of talents.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Without developed capacities to understand consequences, agents cannot genuinely set coherent ends—only simulate goal-setting.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Pursuing arbitrary ends without relevant talents reflects compulsion or accident, not authentic rational agency.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The distinction between rational and non-rational agency requires some developmental threshold of reflective capability.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Agency fundamentally means acting on purposes one has chosen, which requires only goal-setting capacity, not skill mastery.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Tying agency to talent development risks excluding those with disabilities or limited opportunities from moral status.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
A person can rationally pursue ends they lack talent for—pursuing goals doesn't require succeeding at them.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.