Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Rationality may actually require refraining from assignin... — Carmelics
    Home/Natural Theology
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The Wager would not get off the ground if rationality requires refraining from assigning a probability to God's existence.

    Rationality may actually require refraining from assigning a probability when one is in a state of epistemic nullity.

    Natural Theology
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Natural Theology

    Related

    Assigning any probability to God's existence may be inconsistent with a state of...Pascal's Wager presupposes that one should have a probability for God's existenc...The Wager would not get off the ground if rationality requires refraining from a...Unlike a fair coin whose probability we know, the metaphorical 'coin' of God's e...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Natural Theology
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Similar

    Assigning any probability to God's existence may be inconsistent with ...86%The Wager would not get off the ground if rationality requires refrain...79%The Wager would not get off the ground even if rationality merely perm...77%If an agent permissibly refrains from assigning a probability to God's...76%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: pascal-wager
    View source passageHide passage
    1. Undefined probability for God’s existence. Premise 1 presupposes that you should have a probability for God’s existence in the first place. However, perhaps you could rationally fail to assign it a probability—your probability that God exists could remain undefined. We cannot enter here into the thorny issues concerning the attribution of probabilities to agents. But there is some support for this response even in Pascal’s own text, again at the pivotal claim that “[r]eason can decide nothing

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective