Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Rawls's difference principle demands that institutional r... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→A rule-based approach to admissibility of evidence will not undermine the aim of rectitude of decision in the long run

    Rawls's difference principle demands that institutional rules be justified to the worst-off individuals, not merely optimized in aggregate—wrongful convictions cannot be offset by statistical gains.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Rawls(as the philosopher whose ideas are being referenced)
    John Rawls, a 20th-century philosopher famous for developing theories about justice and fairness in society.
    difference principle(Contrasted with FEO as regulating consumption activities rather than self-realization)
    The Rawlsian principle demanding maximization of the social primary goods holdings of the worst-off members of society.
    institutional rules(as the things that need to be justified)
    The formal laws, policies, and systems that governments and organizations set up to govern how society works.
    justified(Epistemological discussion of Socratic wisdom in The Apology)
    Having beliefs formed with adequate evidence or through reliable belief-forming processes, distinct from the ability to demonstrate one's justification to an interrogator.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    offset(as what cannot happen to wrongful convictions)
    Balanced out or canceled out—as if the good outweighs or compensates for the bad.
    optimized in aggregate(as the approach the difference principle rejects)
    Made as large or efficient as possible when you add up all the benefits to everyone combined, without caring how those benefits are distributed.
    worst-off individuals(as the group whose interests the difference principle prioritizes)
    The people in society who have the least money, power, opportunities, or advantages compared to everyone else.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Consequentialism1 linkedJustice & Punishment1 linked

    Related

    A rule-based approach to admissibility of evidence will not undermine the aim of...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective