Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Rawls treats legitimacy as a justificatory standard—coerc... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Political legitimacy should be understood as what creates political authority, not merely what justifies it.

    Rawls treats legitimacy as a justificatory standard—coercion is legitimate when principles could be accepted by reasonable citizens—without entailing that legitimacy itself generates authority.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Coercion(Kant's political philosophy; used to argue coercion is constitutive of rights, not merely instrumental.)
    A restriction of the freedom to pursue one's own ends.
    Legitimacy(as what the argument is discussing whether democracy or autocracy can possess)
    The quality of being rightfully in power; when people accept that a government has the right to rule.
    Rawls(as the philosopher whose ideas are being referenced)
    John Rawls, a 20th-century philosopher famous for developing theories about justice and fairness in society.
    authority(as another method a physician might use to ensure patients comply with treatment)
    The power or right to make decisions and have others follow them, based on expertise or position. A doctor has authority because of their medical knowledge.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    entailing(as whether one claim necessarily requires another)
    Logically requiring something to follow; if A is true, then A entails B means B must also be true.
    justificatory standard(in evaluating laws and authority)
    A measure or test for deciding whether something (like a law or rule) is fair and reasonable; it's the criteria you use to explain why something is okay.
    reasonable citizens(in Rawls's theory of justice)
    People who think fairly, care about others' rights, and are willing to follow rules that benefit everyone—not just themselves.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Social Contract1 linkedRights & Liberty1 linked

    Related

    Political legitimacy should be understood as what creates political authority, n...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective