Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Raz's service conception shows law's authority is justified instrumentally by its helping subjects conform to reasons already applying to them.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Law often creates binding obligations that override pre-existing reasons (e.g., paying taxes for redistribution one morally opposes).
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If law merely helps access existing reasons, it cannot justify authority over those who already understand their moral duties perfectly.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The service conception struggles to account for law's legitimate role in resolving coordination problems where no pre-existing reason exists.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Individuals often lack reliable access to reasons applying to them without intermediary guidance, making law instrumentally valuable.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Law's legitimacy increases when it helps coordinate behavior around pre-existing moral duties rather than creating new obligations.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Service conception explains why we accept legal authority only in domains where it reliably guides us toward independently justified conduct.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.