Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Reality is indeterminate because it is constantly changing — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Perceptions of fleeting, temporary features of things are not simply false

    Reality is indeterminate because it is constantly changing

    PerceptionSkepticism
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    SkepticismPerception

    Related

    Perceptions of fleeting, temporary features of things are not simply falsePerceptions that track actually manifested features cannot be straightforwardly ...Temporary and fleeting features are features things actually manifest on particu...

    Similar

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Skepticism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    What is initially present in inquiry is indeterminate rather than a fu...72%K is undecidable71%An option is intellectually open when evidence is indeterminate (conti...70%The inconsistency of PA^F does not practically threaten strict finitis...70%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: pyrrho
    View source passageHide passage
    The natural way to try to choose between these two interpretations is to see which of them fits best with the logic of the passage as a whole. Unfortunately, a neutral decision on this does not seem be possible. According to the manuscripts, the phrase that follows the words we have been discussing reads “for this reason (dia touto) neither our sensations nor our opinions tell the truth or lie”. On the metaphysical interpretation, the idea would be that, since things are in their real nature ind

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective