Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Reason can identify necessary connections between actions and ends we already have, constituting a form of practical normativity.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Identifying causal connections between actions and ends is descriptive, not normative—it tells us what works, not what we ought to do.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Practical normativity requires reasons to override our desires; mere instrumental efficiency doesn't explain why anyone must pursue their ends.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
We can rationally recognize the best means to an end while remaining unmotivated to pursue it, undermining reason's normative force.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
If you desire health, reason can identify that exercise is causally necessary for achieving it, making exercise rationally binding.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Hypothetical imperatives (if you want X, do Y) are genuinely normative because they follow logically from means-end reasoning.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
We commonly revise actions based on rational recognition of ineffective means, showing reason does generate practical obligations.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.