Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Reason-explanations depend heavily on causal propensities. — Carmelics
    Home/Consciousness & Mind
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Reason-explanations are lower-grade than explanations in the hard sciences.

    Reason-explanations depend heavily on causal propensities.

    CausationConsciousness & Mind
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Consciousness & MindCausation

    Related

    Explanations that depend heavily on causal propensities explain less than the be...Reason-explanations are lower-grade than explanations in the hard sciences.

    Similar

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Consciousness & Mind
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Explanations that depend heavily on causal propensities explain less t...91%Separatists about causal explanation must explain how causation and ca...87%Reason explanations are a form of ordinary causal explanations86%Parsimony in causal explanation requires assigning the same causes to ...85%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: anomalous-monism
    View source passageHide passage
    We have been looking at different ways of making sense of and justifying Davidson’s claim that mental anomalism stems from the constitutive role of rationality in mental ascription. In Davidson’s writings, however, another line of argument often surfaces which focuses less on the rational nature of mental events and more on their causal nature. As we have already seen, in his earliest work on action Davidson argued that reasons explain actions by causing them, and he later came to emphasize that

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective