Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Recent work implementing natural logic suggests a large c... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→There is no compelling practical reason to prefer FOL-based meaning representations over meaning representations more closely aligned with natural language structure

    Recent work implementing natural logic suggests a large class of obvious inferences can be most readily implemented in syntactically analyzed natural language with some adjustments

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge

    Key Terms

    Natural language(as used in logic and linguistics)
    Language as people actually speak and write it (like English or French), rather than artificial systems created for specific purposes.
    Syntactically analyzed(describing how the natural language needs to be organized)
    Breaking down a sentence into its grammatical parts and structures to understand how the words relate to each other.
    implementation

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    (Haugeland's criterion for what it means to physically implement a computation)
    A causal process that reliably carries out the operations specified by a program, with the right causal powers
    inference(Nyāya epistemology)
    A component of epistemology in Nyāya philosophy; a veritable inference yields knowledge about the world and must have premises that are themselves known
    natural logic(MacCartney & Manning 2009)
    A framework for implementing inferences that operates on syntactically analyzed natural language rather than translating into formal logic, closer to Montagovian semantics than FOL-based approaches

    Related

    The main practical motivation for FOL-based approaches is to exploit existing FO...There is no compelling practical reason to prefer FOL-based meaning representati...There is no present reason to believe that inferences easy in FOL are difficult ...

    Similar

    A large class of obvious inferences can be most readily implemented wi...93%Natural logic implementations operate closer to syntactically analyzed...84%Sentences can be used directly, in conjunction with distributional kno...80%A proper logical analysis must account for the full range of ways prop...80%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: computational-linguistics
    View source passageHide passage
    (for some specific time t). However, a difficulty with this strategy is encountered for quantification within intensional contexts, as in the sentence “John believes that every galaxy harbors some life-form.” While we can represent the (implausible) wide-scope reading “For every galaxy there is some life-form such that John believes that the galaxy harbors that life-form,” using the Holds strategy, we cannot readily represent the natural narrow-scope reading because FOL disallows variable-bindi

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective