Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Recognizing a logical probability relation as genuinely t... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→If probability relations are understood as real logical relations holding between propositions, the acquaintance theorist can secure knowledge of probabilistic connections through direct acquaintance.

    Recognizing a logical probability relation as genuinely truth-conducive rather than merely apparent requires a further epistemic act, reintroducing the regress acquaintance was invoked to terminate.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Distinguishing genuine from apparent truth-conduciveness requires criteria beyond the logical relations themselves, else circularity threatens.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Acquaintance with logical relations alone cannot certify their reliability without additional justificatory work that acquaintance alone provides.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Any account claiming to terminate regress via direct awareness must explain why that awareness itself doesn't require further epistemic validation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Recognizing probability relations as truth-conducive requires only understanding their logical structure, not a separate metaphysical act of validation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The regress objection conflates epistemic justification with metaphysical grounding; acquaintance terminates the former without requiring the latter.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If a further epistemic act is needed, the same problem applies recursively, so this view either accepts benign regress or abandons its own premise.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Key Terms

    Regress(as used in epistemology and logic)
    An infinite chain of reasoning where each explanation requires another explanation, like asking 'why?' infinitely and never reaching a final answer.
    acquaintance(Russell's epistemology of singular reference)
    Russell's form of demonstrative identification, in which a subject is directly presented with an object (typically sense data) rather than an extra-mental individual
    epistemic act(as used in epistemology)
    A mental action or step we take in the process of gaining knowledge or justifying a belief.
    epistemology(Contrasted with purely descriptive scientific inquiry)
    A normative enterprise that tells us how we ought to reason from evidence and how we ought to justify our beliefs, as distinct from merely describing how we do reason or justify beliefs
    logical probability relation(as used in epistemology)
    A connection between pieces of information where one thing makes another thing more likely to be true based on the rules of logic.
    truth-conducive(as used in epistemology)
    A method or approach that actually helps you discover what's true, rather than just letting you believe whatever is convenient.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedModality & Possibility1 linked

    Related

    Acquaintance with logical relations alone cannot certify their reliability witho...Any account claiming to terminate regress via direct awareness must explain why ...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit
    Distinguishing genuine from apparent truth-conduciveness requires criteria beyon...
    If a further epistemic act is needed, the same problem applies recursively, so t...
    +3 moreShow less
    If probability relations are understood as real logical relations holding betwee...Recognizing probability relations as truth-conducive requires only understanding...The regress objection conflates epistemic justification with metaphysical ground...