Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Recognizing an argument's implicit premises is necessary for proper argument evaluation

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    2 perspectives
    Reason for 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Toulmin's model shows arguments can be adequately evaluated through explicit claims, data, and warrants without excavating all implicit assumptions.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Requiring full explication of implicit premises generates infinite regress, as every premise itself rests on unstated background commitments.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason for 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Grice's Cooperative Principle entails that competent interlocutors reliably reconstruct shared implicatures without formal premise identification.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If shared background knowledge makes implicit premises mutually evident, explicit recognition adds no epistemic work to evaluation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Implicit premises, like explicit premises, must be evaluated when assessing an argument
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Rejecting implicit premises causes the argument to fail to provide convincing evidence for its conclusion
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.