Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Reducing determinism to chance or teleology obscures expl... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→P2's disjunction between chance and teleology is not exhaustive: deterministic material necessity constitutes a third category reducible to neither.

    Reducing determinism to chance or teleology obscures explanatory features unique to mechanical causation (e.g., counterfactual dependence without intention).

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Connections

    1 linked claim

    P2's disjunction between chance and teleology is not exhaustive: deterministic m...

    Related

    P2's disjunction between chance and teleology is not exhaustive: deterministic m...

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective