Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Reductive theories of what it is to be a value satisfy th... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Virtue Ethics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→If the controversial principle about value-explanations is false, pluralists can explain why their basic values are values without subsuming them under a more fundamental value.

    Reductive theories of what it is to be a value satisfy this description.

    Truth & KnowledgeVirtue Ethics
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Virtue EthicsTruth & Knowledge

    Related

    If such a theory is correct, pluralists can offer an explanation of why their ba...If the controversial principle about value-explanations is false, pluralists can...If the principle is false, an explanatory theory of why both pleasure and knowle...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Virtue Ethics
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Other kinds of theory may also satisfy this description.

    Similar

    Teleological theories are committed to claims about value.84%Teleological theories are not, strictly speaking, theories about value...84%Pluralist theories of value are either explanatorily inadequate or hav...82%A value theory that licenses any desire as value-conferring would endo...81%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: value-theory
    View source passageHide passage
    This argument relies on a highly controversial principle about how an explanation of why something is a value must work — a very similar principle to that which was appealed to in the argument that intrinsic value must be an intrinsic property [section 2.1.1]. If this principle is false, then an explanatory theory of why both pleasure and knowledge are values can be offered which does not work by subsuming them under a further, more fundamental value. Reductive theories of what it is to be a val

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective