Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Reflective equilibrium methods, as developed by Rawls and applied to folk psychology by Stich, can systematically reconcile inconsistent platitudes into coherent theory.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Reflective equilibrium may converge on incoherent compromises rather than truth; coherence ≠ accuracy about psychological phenomena.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Folk platitudes are too unstable and culturally variable to serve as reliable starting points for systematic theory-building.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The method lacks clear stopping conditions; practitioners can indefinitely adjust theory or intuitions, making 'reconciliation' indeterminate.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Reflective equilibrium iteratively adjusts theory and intuitions until coherence emerges, successfully resolving contradictions in actual practice.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Folk psychology contains genuine inconsistencies that rational agents recognize; systematic methods are needed to achieve workable coherence.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Rawls's method has produced influential theories in ethics; applying it to psychology offers comparable prospects for theoretical integration.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.