Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Relational equality is threatened when individuals in a relationship have significantly different power over how they interact with and relate to one another.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Some power asymmetries in relationships are constitutive of their value, not destructive of equality (e.g., parent-child, teacher-student).
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Relational equality requires non-domination and reciprocal recognition, not the elimination of all differential power.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Anderson's democratic equality demands that people not be oppressed, not that power be perfectly symmetric across all relationships.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Pettit's republicanism holds that freedom requires non-domination, which is compatible with power differentials that are properly constrained and accountable.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A relationship can preserve relational equality if subordinate parties retain meaningful exit options and procedural recourse, regardless of power asymmetry.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Relational equality requires the absence of subjection in a relationship.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Subjection occurs when individuals have significantly different power over how they interact with and relate to one another.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.