Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Relations and qualities are not merely imposed by mind but are discovered features of an independent world, as argued by Russell in 'The Problems of Philosophy'.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Which relations exist depends on conceptual schemes: 'family relation' requires minds to define kinship, suggesting relations are mind-dependent.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Fundamental physics reveals no intrinsic properties or relations—only mathematical structures; what we call 'relations' may be interpretive overlays.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Kant showed space and time structure our experience; if forms of intuition are mind-contributed, relational properties within them may be too.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Mathematical truths like 'triangles have three sides' hold regardless of observers, suggesting mind-independent abstract facts exist.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Multiple independent observers perceive identical relational properties (e.g., 'A is north of B'), indicating objective features not merely projected.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Scientific discovery successfully predicts phenomena by uncovering pre-existing natural relations, not inventing them through investigation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42