Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Relative abundance affects the scope of inter-species int... — Carmelics
    Home/Environmental Ethics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Diversity must mean more than species richness

    Relative abundance affects the scope of inter-species interactions

    CausationEnvironmental Ethics
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Environmental EthicsCausation

    Connections

    1 topic

    Truth & Knowledge2 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Environmental Ethics
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Diversity must mean more than species richnessRichness fails to capture relative abundance differences between communitiesThe scope of inter-species interactions is relevant to whatever stability effect...

    Similar

    The scope of inter-species interactions is relevant to whatever stabil...85%If diversity produces stability through species interactions, a specie...77%Diversity must mean more than species richness71%Richness fails to capture relative abundance differences between commu...71%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: ecology
    View source passageHide passage
    What confuses this question from the very beginning, is the multiplicity of possible definitions of “diversity” and “stability.” There are probably no better instances of formalization indeterminacy in any scientific context. For instance, a reasonable first attempt to define diversity would be to equate the diversity of a community to the number of species in it, that is, its species “richness.” The trouble is that there is ample reason to doubt that richness captures all that is relevant about

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective