Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Relative to the set of facts concerning the time traveler... — Carmelics
    Home/Moral Responsibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→A time traveler is able to retro-kill their younger self in one sense but unable to do so in another sense, and these claims are compatible.

    Relative to the set of facts concerning the time traveler's physical capacities and circumstances (functional weapon, good aim, no external interference), the time traveler can retro-kill their younger self.

    Modality & PossibilityMoral Responsibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Moral ResponsibilityModality & Possibility

    Key Terms

    External interference(as used in logic and causation)
    Outside forces or obstacles that might prevent something from happening, like another person stopping you or an unexpected event blocking your plan.
    Functional weapon(as used in this time travel scenario)
    A weapon that is in working order and able to do what it's designed to do.
    Relative to

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Moral Responsibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    (describing how functional ascription depends on an analyst's choices)
    Dependent on or varying according to—meaning it changes based on different factors or viewpoints.
    Set of facts(as used in logic)
    A collection of true statements or information about a situation that we're treating as established and real.
    retro-kill(Time-travel thought experiments)
    The act of a time traveler killing a person in the past, particularly a version of themselves or an ancestor whose survival is a precondition of the time traveler's existence.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Causation2 linkedAll sources support it1 linked

    Related

    A time traveler is able to retro-kill their younger self in one sense but unable...Both 'can' claims are true under their respective contextual readings.Relative to the set of facts concerning the actual past (the time traveler's you...

    Similar

    Relative to the set of facts concerning the actual past (the time trav...90%A time traveler is able to retro-kill their younger self in one sense ...90%You cannot kill your younger self by traveling back in time, even if y...86%A time traveler is unable to retro-kill a person who is alive at the t...86%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: causation-backwards
    View source passageHide passage
    A way out of the paradox was suggested by David Lewis (1976) who argued that the ability of killing somebody should be understood as a possibility compossible with the relevant fact. As an opera singer, for example, you are able to sing operas, since you have the physical capacity and training to do so, but because of a temporary loss of voice, you cannot hum a single tune. What you can do relative to one set of facts, is something you cannot do relative to another set of facts. This contextual

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective