Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Relativism and subjectivism deny that moral judgments hav... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Moral Responsibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Aquinas' teaching on the binding force of erroneous conscience is not a form of moral relativism or subjectivism.

    Relativism and subjectivism deny that moral judgments have objective truth values.

    Moral ResponsibilityTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Moral ResponsibilityTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    2 topics

    Virtue Ethics1 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Moral Responsibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Philosophy of Language
    1 linked

    Related

    A position that presupposes the objective truth or falsity of moral judgments ca...Aquinas' teaching on conscience is an implication of treating moral judgments as...Aquinas' teaching on the binding force of erroneous conscience is not a form of ...

    Similar

    A position that presupposes the objective truth or falsity of moral ju...87%Ethical judgments claiming objectivity are all false80%Embracing moral naturalism requires abandoning the view that moral tru...79%Fully objective moral truths must be independent of human psychology o...79%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: aquinas-moral-political
    View source passageHide passage
    Conscience in Aquinas’ view is not a special power or presence within us, but is our practical intelligence at work, primarily in the form of a stock of judgments about the reasonableness (rightness) or unreasonableness (wrongness) of kinds of action (kinds of option). Since each such judgment is of the form “[It is true that] action of the kind phi is always [or generally] wrong [or: is generally to be done, etc.]” or “phi is [always] [or: generally] required [or forbidden] by reason”, it must

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective