Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Replacing the reflexivity condition on the accessibility relation with seriality allows doxastic models to capture belief rather than knowledge

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    2 perspectives
    Reason for 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Seriality merely requires that an agent has at least one belief, not that beliefs cohere with any epistemic standards distinguishing belief from fantasy.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A relation capturing genuine belief must incorporate sensitivity to evidence, but seriality imposes no such constraint, making the resulting operator too permissive.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Stalnaker's 1996 account shows belief requires a distinct normative structure beyond modal accessibility conditions derivable from weakening knowledge axioms.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason for 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.The KD45 axiomatization preserves positive and negative introspection, forcing idealized agents who know exactly what they believe — an implausible condition for fallible believers.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Williamson's anti-luminosity argument establishes that agents cannot reliably access their own mental states, undermining the introspection axioms retained in doxastic models.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Epistemic models use a reflexive relation to capture knowledge (the Veracity property: what is known is true)
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Seriality (every state has at least one accessible successor) is a weaker condition than reflexivity
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.A doxastic model defined with a transitive, Euclidean, and serial relation satisfies all the properties of the knowledge operator except Veracity
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.