Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Requiring an agent to perform acts that sever their deepest commitments destroys the very self that consequentialism purports to benefit.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Selves are not static essences but evolve through experience; acting against commitments may refine rather than destroy identity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The harm of severing commitments must be weighed against concrete harms prevented; consequentialists do account for such costs.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.People regularly revise deep commitments (through conversion, growth, moral education) without ceasing to exist or losing identity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Personal identity is constituted by deep commitments; severing them fundamentally alters who someone is, not just what they do.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Consequentialism's aim is to benefit agents, but benefits to a destroyed self constitute no genuine benefit to that person.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Integrity and psychological wholeness are intrinsic goods that consequentialist calculations often fail to weigh adequately.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.