Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Requiring awareness of probabilistic connections conflates the conditions for justification with the conditions for knowing that one is justified.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Without some access to why a belief is probably true, we cannot distinguish justified belief from lucky true opinion.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Probabilistic awareness need not be explicit—implicit recognition of evidential connections suffices for justification.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The distinction between justification and meta-justification itself requires some level of cognitive sensitivity to reasons.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
A belief can be justified by reliable processes even if the believer cannot articulate or recognize those probabilistic connections.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Requiring awareness of justifying conditions sets an impossibly high epistemic standard that disqualifies most ordinary knowledge.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Justification is about the objective reliability of belief-formation; meta-awareness is a separate epistemic achievement.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42