Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Requiring certainty about the absence of deceptive impres... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Assent to a cognitive impression should only be given if one has reason to believe deceptive but convincing impressions are not possible in the current context.

    Requiring certainty about the absence of deceptive impressions before assenting generates an infinite regress, as each meta-level check is itself an impression subject to the same standard.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Deceptive impressions(in discussions about what we can trust)
    Thoughts, perceptions, or beliefs that seem true but are actually false or misleading.
    Meta-level(as used in logic and philosophy of language)
    A higher level of thinking where you analyze or talk about something itself, rather than using it directly—like discussing grammar rules rather than just speaking.
    assent(Epictetan epistemology and action theory)
    The cognitive act of accepting a proposition as true, regulated by perceived logical consistency or contradiction with one's existing beliefs.
    epistemology(Contrasted with purely descriptive scientific inquiry)
    A normative enterprise that tells us how we ought to reason from evidence and how we ought to justify our beliefs, as distinct from merely describing how we do reason or justify beliefs

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    infinite regress(modes of argumentation available to a dogmatist)
    An argument structure in which grounds are offered for a claim P, then grounds for those grounds, and so on indefinitely without ever repeating a proposition

    Connections

    1 topic

    Skepticism1 linked

    Related

    Assent to a cognitive impression should only be given if one has reason to belie...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective