Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Restricting Rule (5) by pre-filtering similarities presup... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Rule (5) — assigning non-zero degree of support to every similarity between two domains — must be supplemented with relevance considerations to be viable as a rule of analogical inference.

    Restricting Rule (5) by pre-filtering similarities presupposes the very analogical conclusion it is meant to generate, creating a circularity Hesse identified in confirmational reasoning.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Analogical conclusion(as the outcome of analogical reasoning)
    The final claim or belief you reach by using analogical reasoning—the thing you conclude must be true because of the similarities you found.
    Circularity (circular reasoning)(as used in logic and epistemology)
    A logical problem where you need to assume something is true in order to prove it, making your argument go in circles instead of actually proving anything.
    Confirmational reasoning(as used in epistemology and philosophy of science)
    The process of testing whether an idea or theory is true by looking for evidence that supports it.
    Hesse(as a philosopher whose framework is being discussed)
    Mary B. Hesse was a 20th-century philosopher of science who developed rules for understanding when comparing two things can help us learn about a third thing—like using a familiar situation to understand an unfamiliar one.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    Pre-filtering(as used in methodology and reasoning)
    Sorting or selecting information before it's analyzed, which can bias what you're trying to study by removing certain examples ahead of time.
    Rule (5)(a criterion that the analogy succeeds in meeting)
    A specific criterion or standard (the fifth one in whatever list is being discussed) that the analogy is being tested against to see if it's logically valid.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedPhilosophy of Language1 linked

    Related

    Rule (5) — assigning non-zero degree of support to every similarity between two ...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective