Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Retaining the honorific sense preserves a principled distinction between aesthetic and non-aesthetic engagement that the root-meaning expansion collapses.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Many activities (cooking, gardening, engineering) genuinely involve aesthetic properties without requiring 'honorific' status to recognize them.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The honorific/non-honorific split assumes aesthetic value is rare and elevated, but aesthetic experience pervades ordinary objects and practices.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Conceptual expansion better reflects how aesthetic and functional dimensions coexist in single objects rather than occupying separate categories.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Aesthetic engagement involves distinctive evaluative standards (beauty, form, composition) absent from ordinary functional assessment.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Collapsing honorific and root meanings obscures how aesthetic appreciation requires cultivated perception distinct from everyday experience.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Preserving the distinction protects aesthetic discourse from trivializing comparisons (e.g., 'cooking is art' dilutes 'art' conceptually).
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.