Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Revelation must be described as a paradoxical dialectic of simultaneous unveiling and veiling
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Aquinas's analogical predication allows genuine knowledge of God without contradiction, making paradox unnecessary rather than inevitable.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If human intellect can receive divine form through analogy, revelation can be genuinely transparent without requiring a simultaneous veiling.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
William Alston's doxastic practice framework treats religious experience as epistemically direct perception, not paradoxical mediation.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If mystical perception yields non-inferential justified belief, the veil-unveil dialectic collapses into ordinary epistemology of perception.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
God is Wholly Other
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
As Wholly Other, God is unknowable for humans
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Yet revelation imparts knowledge of God to humans
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.