Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Ritual, moral norms, and righteousness are corrosive to natural efficacy
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Xunzi argues that ritual (li) corrects the distortions of raw human nature, making genuine efficacy possible rather than undermining it.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Natural dispositions toward greed and conflict, left uncultivated, produce social disorder that diminishes collective and individual efficacy.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Therefore, ritual and moral norms are constitutive conditions for efficacy in social beings, not corruptions of it.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
The Daodejing itself (ch. 17-18) treats the emergence of ritual as symptomatic of social decay, not as its cause, implying ritual responds to prior loss of de.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If ritual arises in response to already-diminished naturalness, then ritual is an effect of corrosion rather than its source, reversing the causal claim.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Following nature is efficacious
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Specifically human activity, artifice, and tools such as ritual, moral norms, and righteousness deviate from nature
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.