Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Robert Stern and William Desmond have articulated formal ... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→There is no clearly articulated full set of premises for a 'Hegelian' ontological argument.

    Robert Stern and William Desmond have articulated formal reconstructions of Hegel's argument that God's concept entails actuality through dialectical self-negation.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Hegel's dialectical method shows how pure concepts necessarily develop through internal negation, making logical development rigorous and systematic.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If God's concept is truly infinite and complete, it must actualize itself rather than remain merely potential, avoiding incoherent limitations.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Stern and Desmond's reconstructions demonstrate that ontological arguments gain explanatory power when grounded in Hegelian dialectical logic rather than Cartesian intuition.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Dialectical self-negation describes conceptual development, not metaphysical existence; conflating logical and ontological registers commits a category error.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Even if God's concept is infinite, necessity of conceptual development doesn't entail that actuality must follow from logical operations on concepts.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Stern and Desmond's reconstructions may impose systematic coherence on Hegel's texts rather than recover his actual argument, risking charitable over-interpretation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Natural Theology1 linked

    Related

    Dialectical self-negation describes conceptual development, not metaphysical exi...Even if God's concept is infinite, necessity of conceptual development doesn't e...Hegel's dialectical method shows how pure concepts necessarily develop through i...If God's concept is truly infinite and complete, it must actualize itself rather...
    +3 moreShow less
    Stern and Desmond's reconstructions demonstrate that ontological arguments gain ...Stern and Desmond's reconstructions may impose systematic coherence on Hegel's t...There is no clearly articulated full set of premises for a 'Hegelian' ontologica...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit