Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Roderick Chisholm and agent causation theorists argue tha... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Behavior caused by beliefs and desires is necessary but not sufficient for that behavior to count as action.

    Roderick Chisholm and agent causation theorists argue that genuine action requires a sui generis causal relation between the agent-as-substance and the event, irreducible to event causation by mental states.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Agent causation(Emphasized in Aquinas's later work, per Montagnes)
    The active transmission of properties from God to creatures.
    Agent-as-substance(as used in agent causation theory)
    The idea of a person as a fundamental, enduring thing (substance) that can directly cause events, rather than just being a collection of thoughts and feelings.
    Event causation(as contrasted with agent causation)
    The common-sense idea that one thing happens (an event) because something else happened first—like dominoes falling, where one event causes the next.
    Roderick Chisholm(as referenced by name in the statement)
    A 20th-century American philosopher known for developing detailed theories about knowledge, justified belief, and how much evidence we need to believe something.
    irreducible

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    (Personalist anthropology; distinguishes personhood from mere biological individuality)
    That which is unique and unrepeatable in each human being, by virtue of which a person is not merely an individual of a species but a personal subject.
    mental states(Herder's theory of mind)
    Conditions consisting in forces that manifest themselves in people's bodily behavior, conceptually tied to corresponding types of bodily behavior but not reducible thereto
    sui generis(Used to characterize goodness if naturalistic definitions all fail.)
    A notion that can only be understood in its own terms — in this context, goodness can only be understood in evaluative, not empirical or naturalistic, terms.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Consciousness & Mind1 linkedMoral Responsibility1 linked

    Related

    Behavior caused by beliefs and desires is necessary but not sufficient for that ...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective