Russell's proposed revision conflates the standard for right action with the standard for rational or praiseworthy action, a distinction central to act-consequentialist theory since Railton's 1984 account of sophisticated consequentialism.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Act-consequentialist theory(as the broader ethical framework being discussed): A moral theory that judges whether an action is right or wrong based entirely on its consequences or outcomes, rather than on the action itself or the person's intentions.
Railton(as a philosopher who developed a key theory in 1984): Peter Railton is a contemporary American philosopher who developed an influential version of consequentialism that tries to address criticisms of the theory.
Russell: # Russell Russell most commonly refers to **Bertrand Russell**, a highly influential British philosopher, logician, and social critic (1872-1970) who fundamentally changed how we think about logic, language, and knowledge. He's famous for showing that common-sense reasoning can contain hidden contradictions and for arguing that philosophy should use the precision of mathematics to solve problems. Russell also became a prominent public intellectual who wrote about everything from religion to nuclear weapons, making him one of the most important thinkers of the 20th century.
Sophisticated consequentialism

Based on where you are in your exploration