Ruth Chang's work on 'on a par' options demonstrates that value comparisons can be neither better, worse, nor equal, a logical space monism collapses by reducing all comparisons to a single ordinal scale.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Ruth Chang(as the philosopher proposing the concept discussed): A contemporary philosopher who studies how we make decisions and comparisons between things, particularly when it's unclear which option is better.
monism(Used to describe classical utilitarianism as an example of a single-principle moral theory.): A moral position that holds there is only one absolute moral principle, such that conflict between principles is impossible.
on a par(Chang's terminology for the parity relation): The relational status of two options A and B when parity holds: they are comparable but not ordered by the standard three relations
ordinal scale(Measurement of linguistic acceptability judgments): A scale that represents items in ranked order but does not capture the magnitude of difference between positions.

Based on where you are in your exploration