Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Ryle's distinction between knowing-that and knowing-how shows that much epistemic progress occurs through habituated, attention-independent competence.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Habituated competence may depend on tacit knowing-that; the distinction doesn't prove know-how is epistemic progress rather than mere behavioral conditioning.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Attention-independence doesn't establish epistemic status; procedural automaticity in false beliefs (superstitions) progresses skill without advancing knowledge.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Ryle's distinction conflates epistemology with psychology; showing competence operates automatically doesn't establish it as a separate form of knowledge-production.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Expert performance (chess, surgery, athletics) demonstrates competence that operates below conscious attention, suggesting know-how constitutes genuine epistemic progress.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Habituated skills resist propositional articulation yet enable successful navigation of complex environments, indicating knowledge beyond knowing-that.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The acquisition of fluency requires repeated practice that gradually reduces cognitive load, showing progress through embodied competence rather than belief accumulation.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.