Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    s1(n) and s2(n) are space constructible — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Truth & Knowledge
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→SPACE(s1(n)) is a proper subset of SPACE(s2(n)) when s2 grows sufficiently faster than s1

    s1(n) and s2(n) are space constructible

    Proof of definition segmentsTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Truth & KnowledgeProof of definition segments

    Connections

    2 topics

    All sources support it1 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Truth & Knowledge
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Modality & Possibility
    1 linked

    Related

    SPACE(s1(n)) is a proper subset of SPACE(s2(n)) when s2 grows sufficiently faste...The limit of s1(n) / s2(n) as n approaches infinity equals 0

    Similar

    s1(n) and s2(n) are space constructible functions with s2(n) >= s1(n) ...95%Savitch's Theorem: for any space constructible function s(n), NSPACE(s...84%By Savitch's Theorem, NSPACE(s(n)) is a subset of SPACE((s(n))^2) for ...83%For any space constructible function s(n), NSPACE(s(n)) is a subset of...82%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: computational-complexity
    View source passageHide passage
    On the other hand, if \(x \not\in X\), then all of \(N\)’s computations from \(C_0(x)\) are required to lead to rejecting states. Non-deterministic machines are sometimes described as making undetermined ‘choices’ among different possible successor configurations at various points during their computation. But what the foregoing definitions actually describe is a tree \(\mathcal{T}^N_{C_0}\) of all possible computation sequences starting from a given configuration \(C_0\) for a deterministic mac

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective