Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Sally and Samantha's reduced ambition is caused by rigid ... — Carmelics
    Home/Moral Responsibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Genuine substantive equality of opportunity has not been achieved in a society where rigid sex-stereotyped socialization instills ambition in boys and quashes it in girls, even if Formal Equality of Opportunity (FEO) is technically satisfied.

    Sally and Samantha's reduced ambition is caused by rigid sex-stereotyped socialization, not by their native choices or talents.

    Justice & PunishmentMoral Responsibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Moral ResponsibilityJustice & Punishment

    Connections

    1 topic

    Rights & Liberty4 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Moral Responsibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    A fair opportunity to develop ambition requires that socialization not be discri...Genuine substantive equality of opportunity has not been achieved in a society w...Sally and Samantha are equally talented as Sam and Ben but far less ambitious, r...Sam and Ben benefited from favorable socialization that Sally and Samantha did n...

    Similar

    Native talent alone does not determine fair opportunity if socializati...83%Genuine substantive equality of opportunity has not been achieved in a...79%Sally and Samantha are equally talented as Sam and Ben but far less am...77%FEO should be modified so that if a person ends up with lesser prospec...77%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: equal-opportunity
    View source passageHide passage
    But other cases are different and call in question this division of responsibility. Suppose that FEO obtains in a society but overwhelmingly boys develop the ambition to pursue challenging and lucrative careers and girls overwhelmingly do not. The explanation is that boys and girls alike are subjected to a rigid form of socialization which instills ambition in boys and quashes it in girls. In this case one might say that even though FEO is not violated when Sam and Ben become lawyers and doctors

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective