Samuel Clarke's cosmological argument establishes that a necessarily existent being cannot have contingent or temporally indexed properties, making 'not yet' incompatible with genuine divinity.
?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.
Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.
(Bishop and Perszyk's usage within the euteleological model)
The property or activity of being the supreme good; on the euteleological model, not a substance or person but a quality instantiable by concrete occasions of love.
necessarily existent Being(Cosmological argument for the existence of God)
A being that carries the reason of its own existence in itself and cannot be supposed not to exist without an express contradiction.