Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Sanction utilitarianism is internally inconsistent becaus... — Carmelics
    Home/Consequentialism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The sanction theory of rights does not provide a good reconciliation of rights and utility

    Sanction utilitarianism is internally inconsistent because it combines indirect and direct utilitarian claims

    Consequentialism
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Consequentialism

    Connections

    1 topic

    Rights & Liberty4 linked

    Related

    The sanction theory of rights does not provide a good reconciliation of rights a...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Consequentialism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    The sanction theory of rights inherits the problems of the sanction theory of du...
    The sanction theory of rights is committed to sanction utilitarianism
    Therefore the sanction theory of rights inherits the internal inconsistency of s...

    Similar

    Sanction utilitarianism is internally inconsistent94%Sanction utilitarianism is inconsistent with act utilitarianism.82%Applying a direct utilitarian standard to the application of sanctions...78%Sanction utilitarianism has a hybrid structure that combines an indire...76%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: mill-moral-political
    View source passageHide passage
    Does the sanction theory of rights provide a good reconciliation of rights and utility? Not surprisingly, the sanction theory of rights inherits the problems of the sanction theory of duty. Recall that we found sanction utilitarianism to be internally inconsistent insofar as it combines indirect and direct utilitarian claims (§2.10). Because the sanction theory of rights is committed to sanction utilitarianism, it inherits this inconsistency.

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective