Sartre's radical freedom requires a pour-soi that constitutes meaning, yet the historical a priori shaping what counts as meaningful choice remains outside the cogito's self-transparency.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Historical a priori(Husserl's Crisis of European Sciences): The structural precondition inherent in history itself — not a-historical but transcendentally derived — that assures the objectivity of history and is presupposed by the idealization that insights of principle are historical.
Sartre(the main philosopher being discussed): Jean-Paul Sartre was a 20th-century French philosopher who argued that humans are fundamentally free to create their own meaning and identity, and that this freedom comes with responsibility.
Self-transparency(as used in Hegelian philosophy and philosophy of mind): The state of a mind having complete, perfect understanding of itself—knowing everything about your own thoughts, consciousness, and existence without any hidden or unclear parts.
a priori(Frege treats 'analytic' as entailing 'a priori' for arithmetic.): Knowable independently of empirical experience; here treated as a consequence of analyticity.

Based on where you are in your exploration