Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Satisfaction represents truth in the model-theoretic fram... — Carmelics
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→A valid argument is truth-preserving

    Satisfaction represents truth in the model-theoretic framework

    Philosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of Language

    Related

    A valid argument is truth-preservingAn argument is valid if its conclusion comes out true under every interpretation...

    Similar

    Interpolation lies at the intersection of proof theory and model theor...80%

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    A definition equivalent to a model-theoretic (semantic) definition is ...78%
    Newton's model is a logical model because it makes the axioms of Newto...78%
    Interpolation thus lies at the intersection of proof theory and model ...78%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: logic-classical
    View source passageHide passage
    We say that an argument \(\langle \Gamma,\theta \rangle\) is semantically valid, or just valid, written \(\Gamma \vDash \theta\), if for every interpretation \(M\) of the language, if \(M\vDash\psi\), for every member \(\psi\) of \(\Gamma\), then \(M\vDash\theta\). If \(\Gamma \vDash \theta\), we also say that \(\theta\) is a logical consequence, or semantic consequence, or model-theoretic consequence of \(\Gamma\). The definition corresponds to the informal idea that an argument is valid if it

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective