Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Savulescu's claim that inequality-promoting traits cannot... — Carmelics
    Home/Bioethics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Savulescu's claim that inequality-promoting traits cannot promote wellbeing is either irrelevant or false.

    Bioethics
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    0 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Prospective parents choosing traits that contribute to inequality may do so without realizing those traits undermine their children's wellbeing.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Parents may only realize their choices contributed to injustice after the harm is done.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.In racist societies, selecting fair-skinned children would not diminish the wellbeing of those selected children, yet it would perpetuate injustice.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    BioethicsConsequentialism

    Connections

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    2 topics

    Moral Responsibility2 linkedJustice & Punishment1 linked

    Related

    In racist societies, selecting fair-skinned children would not diminish the well...Parents may only realize their choices contributed to injustice after the harm i...Prospective parents choosing traits that contribute to inequality may do so with...

    Similar

    Traits that contribute to inequality are unlikely to promote wellbeing...88%Social injustice cannot result from selecting or editing for traits th...85%Prospective parents choosing traits that contribute to inequality may ...80%Stein's utilitarian argument for a strict disability-welfare correlati...75%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: eugenics
    View source passageHide passage
    Some have denied that social injustice could result from selecting or editing for particular traits that increase people’s chances at a better life (Savulescu 2001). To the extent that those traits contribute to inequality, the argument goes, it is unlikely that they could promote wellbeing (Savulescu 2001, 424). This claim seems, however, either irrelevant or false (de Melo-Martin 2017). Prospective parents choosing certain traits for their children could do so without realizing that they are a
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (0 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit