Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Saying defective enactments 'fail to constitute law' mere... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→If procedurally defective enactments fail to constitute law at all, then the claim's framework of 'setting aside' posited law mischaracterizes the adjudicative task as one of exception rather than legal identification.

    Saying defective enactments 'fail to constitute law' merely relabels rather than resolves whether courts exercise authority to nullify apparent legal acts.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Connections

    1 linked claim

    If procedurally defective enactments fail to constitute law at all, then the cla...

    Related

    If procedurally defective enactments fail to constitute law at all, then the cla...

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    0 (0 for, 0 against)

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective