Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Saying something is wrong for a particular reason is simp... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Moral Responsibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The statement 'that is stealing and therefore it is wrong' is not an argument or inference, but rather an account of the presence of a reason and a statement of what that reason is for

    Saying something is wrong for a particular reason is simply identifying the reason and what it counts against, not performing an inference

    Moral ResponsibilityPhilosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Moral ResponsibilityPhilosophy of Language

    Connections

    1 topic

    Truth & Knowledge1 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Moral Responsibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    An argument requires premises and a conclusion connected by inferenceThe particularist reads 'that is stealing and therefore it is wrong' as saying '...The statement 'that is stealing and therefore it is wrong' is not an argument or...

    Similar

    Agents' failure to act on reasons is due to error or ignorance, not th...82%The statement 'that is stealing and therefore it is wrong' is not an a...81%Purposive (reason) explanations are not species of causal explanation.78%We can find no true assertion without there being a sufficient reason ...77%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: moral-particularism
    View source passageHide passage
    Finally, in this section, how does the particularist understand someone who says ‘that is stealing, and therefore you should not do it’? One way of understanding what is said here is as an abbreviated argument, which fully specified reads ‘that is stealing and stealing is always wrong; therefore that is wrong’. This reading introduces silent appeal to a principle—either absolute or contributory, according to one’s way of understanding ‘that is wrong’. And it suggests that what we have here is re

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective