Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Scanlon's account in 'What We Owe to Each Other' explicit... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The reason 'because it is wrong' cannot be fed into the contractualist apparatus.

    Scanlon's account in 'What We Owe to Each Other' explicitly allows that the wrongness of treating persons as mere means generates complaints individuals can advance in the contractualist procedure.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Complaints individuals can advance(as moral standing in contractualism)
    Valid objections or grievances that a person could raise against others for treating them wrongly, which others would have to take seriously as legitimate.
    Contractualist procedure(as the method Scanlon uses)
    The process of testing whether an action is morally acceptable by asking whether the principles behind it could be reasonably agreed to by everyone affected.
    Scanlon
    # Scanlon Tim Scanlon is an influential American philosopher known for developing a theory of ethics based on the idea that actions are right if they could be justified to others through principles everyone could reasonably accept. Rather than focusing on happiness or duty, his approach emphasizes what we can defend to each other as fair-minded people, making morality fundamentally about mutual respect and agreement. He's considered one of the most important moral philosophers of our time because his ideas have reshaped how philosophers think about fairness, responsibility, and what we owe to one another.
    What We Owe to Each Other

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    (as the cited work)
    A major 1998 book by philosopher T.M. Scanlon that argues moral wrongness is fundamentally about violating principles that others could reasonably reject.
    contractualism
    A moral theory presented as a genuine alternative to both consequentialism and Kantian ethics, one that coheres with distinctively non-utilitarian intuitions in certain key cases
    treating persons as mere means(describing what Korsgaard argues is wrong)
    Using someone only as a tool to get what you want, without respecting them as someone with their own goals and dignity.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Justice & Punishment1 linkedMoral Responsibility1 linked

    Related

    The reason 'because it is wrong' cannot be fed into the contractualist apparatus...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective