Scanlon's contractualism, though person-affecting, permits pairwise comparison of claims that functionally approximates aggregation, undermining the strict separateness-based prohibition.
?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.
Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.
(Used by utilitarians to justify saving the greater number; rejected by contractualism)
The moral practice of summing individual harms or deaths across persons to determine which outcome is worse overall
contractualism
A moral theory presented as a genuine alternative to both consequentialism and Kantian ethics, one that coheres with distinctively non-utilitarian intuitions in certain key cases
separateness of persons(Invoked by Taurek and Nozick to resist aggregative moral reasoning.)
The principle that individuals are distinct and their harms or interests cannot be pooled or traded off against one another as if they belonged to a single entity.