Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Scanlon's contractualism, though person-affecting, permit... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→A wrong to one person and a wrong to another person cannot be added together to constitute a single greater wrong.

    Scanlon's contractualism, though person-affecting, permits pairwise comparison of claims that functionally approximates aggregation, undermining the strict separateness-based prohibition.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Pairwise comparison(the method that Scanlon's theory uses to evaluate claims)
    Comparing two things side-by-side, one pair at a time, rather than looking at everything all together at once.
    Person-affecting(describes a limitation of Scanlon's theory)
    A principle that only counts impacts on actual people as morally relevant—you can't do something bad 'for the greater good' if it harms specific individuals who could otherwise exist.
    Scanlon
    # Scanlon Tim Scanlon is an influential American philosopher known for developing a theory of ethics based on the idea that actions are right if they could be justified to others through principles everyone could reasonably accept. Rather than focusing on happiness or duty, his approach emphasizes what we can defend to each other as fair-minded people, making morality fundamentally about mutual respect and agreement. He's considered one of the most important moral philosophers of our time because his ideas have reshaped how philosophers think about fairness, responsibility, and what we owe to one another.
    aggregation

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    (Used by utilitarians to justify saving the greater number; rejected by contractualism)
    The moral practice of summing individual harms or deaths across persons to determine which outcome is worse overall
    contractualism
    A moral theory presented as a genuine alternative to both consequentialism and Kantian ethics, one that coheres with distinctively non-utilitarian intuitions in certain key cases
    separateness of persons(Invoked by Taurek and Nozick to resist aggregative moral reasoning.)
    The principle that individuals are distinct and their harms or interests cannot be pooled or traded off against one another as if they belonged to a single entity.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Consequentialism1 linked

    Related

    A wrong to one person and a wrong to another person cannot be added together to ...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective