Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Scanlon's contractual framework logically entails that re... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Scanlon's reasonable rejectability test applies symmetrically: any principle permitting uncompensated natural disadvantage is rejectable by the worst-off, collapsing into Rawlsian difference-principle egalitarianism.

    Scanlon's contractual framework logically entails that rejectable principles cannot form the basis of legitimate social rules, forcing convergence on difference-principle redistribution.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Contractual framework(describing Scanlon's approach to ethics and social rules)
    A way of thinking about fairness and rules by imagining that people are making a contract or agreement together—a rule is fair if everyone could agree to it.
    Difference-principle redistribution(the specific type of economic fairness that Scanlon's theory supposedly requires)
    An approach to dividing resources and wealth where inequalities are only allowed if they make the worst-off people in society better off than they would be otherwise.
    Legitimate social rules(contrasted with rules based on rejectable principles)
    Laws or norms that society should actually follow because they are fair and justified, not just rules that happen to exist.
    Rejectable principles(principles that Scanlon's theory says cannot legitimately govern society)
    Rules or guidelines that people could reasonably object to or refuse to accept because they seem unfair.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    Scanlon
    # Scanlon Tim Scanlon is an influential American philosopher known for developing a theory of ethics based on the idea that actions are right if they could be justified to others through principles everyone could reasonably accept. Rather than focusing on happiness or duty, his approach emphasizes what we can defend to each other as fair-minded people, making morality fundamentally about mutual respect and agreement. He's considered one of the most important moral philosophers of our time because his ideas have reshaped how philosophers think about fairness, responsibility, and what we owe to one another.
    convergence(alternative to consensus-based public reason)
    A model of public justification that allows appeals to religious reasons, thereby not requiring exclusively secular justifications
    logically entails(used to describe the relationship between S# and statement (14))
    If one statement logically entails another, it means the second statement must be true whenever the first one is true—there's no way around it.

    Connections

    1 linked claim

    Scanlon's reasonable rejectability test applies symmetrically: any principle per...

    Related

    Scanlon's reasonable rejectability test applies symmetrically: any principle per...

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective