Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Schopenhauer and Buddhist traditions hold that categorica... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Categorical desires give a person reason to live.

    Schopenhauer and Buddhist traditions hold that categorical desires reflect attachment, which generates suffering rather than reasons for continued existence.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Empirically, pursuit of categorical desires (wealth, status, relationships) produces hedonic adaptation—satisfaction fades, requiring escalation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Buddhist phenomenology demonstrates that attachment to impermanent objects creates dukkha through inevitable loss and disappointment.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Schopenhauer's will-based metaphysics explains why desire-satisfaction reinforces the cycle rather than resolving the underlying striving.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Some categorical desires (parenting, meaningful work) generate intrinsic satisfaction independent of hedonic adaptation or loss.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The claim confuses whether desires cause suffering with whether suffering justifies renouncing desires—these require separate arguments.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Buddhist non-attachment aims at equanimity with desires, not elimination of them; this differs from Schopenhauer's pessimistic denial.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Afterlife & Death1 linked

    Related

    Buddhist non-attachment aims at equanimity with desires, not elimination of them...Buddhist phenomenology demonstrates that attachment to impermanent objects creat...Categorical desires give a person reason to live.Empirically, pursuit of categorical desires (wealth, status, relationships) prod...
    +3 moreShow less
    Schopenhauer's will-based metaphysics explains why desire-satisfaction reinforce...Some categorical desires (parenting, meaningful work) generate intrinsic satisfa...The claim confuses whether desires cause suffering with whether suffering justif...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit