Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Science must employ arguments that pass the threshold of ... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Truth & Knowledge
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Logic alone is insufficient for science; science requires more than valid deduction.

    Science must employ arguments that pass the threshold of valid deduction.

    Truth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Truth & Knowledge

    Connections

    2 topics

    Modality & Possibility1 linkedPhilosophy of Language1 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Truth & Knowledge
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Related

    A deduction is minimally a valid syllogism.Logic alone is insufficient for science; science requires more than valid deduct...Premises that are more intelligible by nature reveal the genuine, mind-independe...Science additionally requires premises that are necessary and more intelligible ...

    Similar

    A deduction is a valid or acceptable argument whose structure guarante...85%A deduction is an argument in which when certain things are laid down ...81%Aristotle maintains that irrelevant premises will ruin a deduction79%Ambiguous use of a term can create the illusion that a fallacious argu...78%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: aristotle
    View source passageHide passage
    Aristotle approaches the study of logic not as an end in itself, but with a view to its role in human inquiry and explanation. Logic is a tool, he thinks, one making an important but incomplete contribution to science and dialectic. Its contribution is incomplete because science (epistêmê) employs arguments which are more than mere deductions. A deduction is minimally a valid syllogism, and certainly science must employ arguments passing this threshold. Still, science needs more: a science proce

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective