Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Scientific axioms may be imperfect approximations to reality

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    2 perspectives
    Reason for 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Scientific axioms like the law of non-contradiction are necessary truths knowable through intellect alone, not empirical approximation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Aristotle's demonstrative science derives axioms from the essential natures of things, yielding certainty independent of knowledge of any First Cause.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If axioms were mere approximations, deductive demonstration would collapse into probability, yet geometry and logic yield necessary conclusions.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason for 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.The argument conflates epistemic limitations with ontological imperfection, committing a genetic fallacy about the origin of knowledge.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Kant's Critique demonstrates that certain synthetic a priori principles like causality are constitutive of experience itself, not approximations to an external reality.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Scientific axioms are not derived from a total understanding of the First Cause
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Only knowledge derived from a total understanding of the First Cause would guarantee perfect correspondence to reality
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42