Scientific causal reasoning implicitly assumes relevance: we reject conditionals where antecedent and consequent are logically unrelated, suggesting relevance constraints are necessary.
?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.
Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.
Rules or limits that say a cause must actually be connected to its effect in a meaningful way, not just happen to occur together by accident.
causal reasoning(Hume's analysis of induction)
Reasoning in which past observations serve as evidence for judgments regarding what will happen in relevantly similar circumstances in the future, depending on the assumption that the future course of nature will resemble the past