Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Scientific hypotheses make testable predictions only rela... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Scientific hypotheses make testable predictions only relative to background information and auxiliary hypotheses that tie them to the evidence.

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    0 reasons against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Scientific hypotheses often make little contact with evidence claims on their own.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.In most cases, empirical predictions require auxiliary hypotheses connecting the hypothesis to observable phenomena.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge

    Related

    In most cases, empirical predictions require auxiliary hypotheses connecting the...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Skepticism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Scientific hypotheses often make little contact with evidence claims on their ow...

    Similar

    In most cases, empirical predictions require auxiliary hypotheses conn...84%Competing hypotheses may rely on different auxiliary hypotheses to acc...83%Changes in scientific background knowledge alter the auxiliary assumpt...81%When competing hypotheses employ different auxiliary hypotheses, evide...81%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: logic-inductive
    View source passageHide passage
    Before going on to describing the logic of evidential support in more detail, perhaps a few more words are in order about the background knowledge and auxiliary hypotheses, represented here by ‘\(b\)’. Duhem (1906) and Quine (1953) are generally credited with alerting inductive logicians to the importance of auxiliary hypotheses in connecting scientific hypotheses and theories to empirical evidence. (See the entry on Pierre Duhem.) They point out that scientific hypotheses often make little co
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (1 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit